In Re M.L.L.-R v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 22, 2024
Docket01-24-00603-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re M.L.L.-R v. the State of Texas (In Re M.L.L.-R v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re M.L.L.-R v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Opinion issued August 22, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00603-CV ——————————— IN RE M.L.L.-R., RELATOR

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, parent of a minor child, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus

requesting that this Court compel Valley Oaks Elementary School and Spring

Branch Independent School District to “perform [their] statutory duty by promptly

granting [relator’s] petition to repeat grade.”

“Except to protect our jurisdiction, our authority to issue writs of mandamus

is limited to district and county court judges.” Jenness v. Daggett, No. 01-88-01031-

CV, 1988 WL 125197, 1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 23, 1988, no writ); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221. There is no underlying lawsuit to compel the

elementary school or the school district to act, thus mandamus would not serve to

protect our jurisdiction. And, we have no jurisdiction otherwise to mandamus the

elementary school or the school district. See id.

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for lack of

jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re M.L.L.-R v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mll-r-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.