in Re Mjg
This text of in Re Mjg (in Re Mjg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 7, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack 156338-40 & (72)(74) David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder Elizabeth T. Clement, SC: 156338 Justices In re MJG, Minor. COA: 332928 Oakland CC Family Division: 2015-832895-AD
_________________________________________/
SC: 156339 In re BGP, Minor. COA: 333700 Oakland CC Family Division: 2015-837535-AD
SC: 156340 In re JSP, Minor. COA: 333813 Oakland CC Family Division: 2016-838283-AD
On order of the Court, the motion to strike the notice of intervention is considered, and it is GRANTED. There is no justiciable controversy because the losing parties did not file an application for leave to appeal and the Attorney General does not represent an aggrieved party. Federated Ins Co v Oakland County Rd Comm, 475 Mich 286 (2006). The application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED. The motion to extend time to file an answer is DISMISSED as moot.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 7, 2018 s0228 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Mjg, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mjg-mich-2018.