In re Mizzell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Mizzell

479 S.E.2d 62, 325 S.C. 57, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 220

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 19, 1996·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has filed a petition seeking an order temporarily suspending respondent from the practice of law in this State pursuant to Paragraph 7(B) of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, Rule 413, SCACR. A hearing was held in this matter and we conclude the Board’s petition should be granted. Accordingly, respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr. C.J.

/s/ Jean H. Toal A.J.

/s/ James E, Moore A.J.

/s/ John H. WaUer, Jr. A.J.

/s/ E.C. Burnett, III A.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has filed a petition seeking an order temporarily suspending respondent from the practice of law in this State pursuant to Paragraph 7(B) of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, Rule 413, SCACR. A hearing was held in this matter and we conclude the Board’s petition should be granted. Accordingly, respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr. C.J.

/s/ Jean H. Toal A.J.

/s/ James E, Moore A.J.

/s/ John H. WaUer, Jr. A.J.

/s/ E.C. Burnett, III A.J.

In re Mizzell, 479 S.E.2d 62, 325 S.C. 57, 1996 S.C. LEXIS 220 (S.C. 1996).

Pincite

479 S.E.2d 62 (In re Mizzell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.