In re Mithun

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Mithun

737 So. 2d 1, 1998 La. LEXIS 3798, 1998 WL 960138

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 16, 1998

DocketNo. 98-B-3046

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 737 So. 2d 1 (In re Mithun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mithun, 737 So. 2d 1, 1998 La. LEXIS 3798, 1998 WL 960138 (La. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Considering the foregoing Joint Petition for Interim Suspension:

IT IS ORDERED that respondent, Richard James Mithum, attorney at law, be and hereby is, placed on interim suspension from the practice of law, said suspension to be effective immediately, and remaining in effect until further orders of this court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that from the date of the filing of the petition until the effective date of the interim suspension, respondent shall not undertake the representation of new clients and shall fully comply with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel is directed to institute appropriate disciplinary proceedings pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 11.

/s/ Jeffrey P. Victory

Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

MARCUS, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part 11, § 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI