In re Mithun
Opinion
ORDER
Considering the foregoing Joint Petition for Interim Suspension:
IT IS ORDERED that respondent, Richard James Mithum, attorney at law, be and hereby is, placed on interim suspension from the practice of law, said suspension to be effective immediately, and remaining in effect until further orders of this court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that from the date of the filing of the petition until the effective date of the interim suspension, respondent shall not undertake the representation of new clients and shall fully comply with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26.
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel is directed to institute appropriate disciplinary proceedings pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 11.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
737 So. 2d 1 (In re Mithun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.