In re Mitchum

566 S.E.2d 193, 350 S.C. 202, 2001 S.C. LEXIS 210
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided September 24, 2001·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent was suspended on December 14, 1998, for a period of ninety days, retroactive to October 12, 1998. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer. Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

/a/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Mitchum, 566 S.E.2d 193, 350 S.C. 202, 2001 S.C. LEXIS 210 (S.C. 2001).

566 S.E.2d 193 (In re Mitchum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.