In re Mitchum

566 S.E.2d 193, 350 S.C. 202, 2001 S.C. LEXIS 210
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedSeptember 24, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 566 S.E.2d 193 (In re Mitchum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Mitchum, 566 S.E.2d 193, 350 S.C. 202, 2001 S.C. LEXIS 210 (S.C. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent was suspended on December 14, 1998, for a period of ninety days, retroactive to October 12, 1998. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer. Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

/a/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
566 S.E.2d 193, 350 S.C. 202, 2001 S.C. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mitchum-sc-2001.