In re Mitchell

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

In re Mitchell

166 A.3d 578, 2017 R.I. LEXIS 100

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedSeptember 7, 2017

DocketNo. 2017-311-MP

StatusPublished

This text of 166 A.3d 578 (In re Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mitchell, 166 A.3d 578, 2017 R.I. LEXIS 100 (R.I. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On or about September 5, 2017, pursuant to Article III, Rule 13 of the Supreme . Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure, the respondent filed an affidavit with this Court’s Disciplinary Board setting forth that he is aware he is the subject of an investigation of professional misconduct. The respondent’s affidavit sets forth that he freely and voluntarily consents to disbarment and that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his consent. On September 6, 2017, Disciplinary Counsel filed the respondent’s affidavit with the Court.

Upon review of the respondent’s affidavit, we deem that an order disbarring the respondent is appropriate.

Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 13, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that the respondent, Vincent J. Mitchell, be and is hereby disbarred on consent from engaging in the practice of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On or about September 5, 2017, pursuant to Article III, Rule 13 of the Supreme . Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure, the respondent filed an affidavit with this Court’s Disciplinary Board setting forth that he is aware he is the subject of an investigation of professional misconduct. The respondent’s affidavit sets forth that he freely and voluntarily consents to disbarment and that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his consent. On September 6, 2017, Disciplinary Counsel filed the respondent’s affidavit with the Court.

Upon review of the respondent’s affidavit, we deem that an order disbarring the respondent is appropriate.

Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 13, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that the respondent, Vincent J. Mitchell, be and is hereby disbarred on consent from engaging in the practice of law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 A.3d 578, 2017 R.I. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mitchell-ri-2017.