In Re Mitchell
570 S.E.2d 212, 356 N.C. 288
Opinion
In the Matter of MITCHELL, M., a minor child, d.o.b. 12/24/94.
In the Matter of Mitchell, K., a minor child, d.o.b. 01/16/98.
In the Matter of Mitchell, K., a minor child, d.o.b. 02/06/96.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, P.L.L.C., by Stuart A. Brock, Winston-Salem, for appellant Guardian ad Litem.
Charles W. McKeller, Brevard, for respondent-appellee Cynthia Chatman.
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Mitchell, 570 S.E.2d 212, 356 N.C. 288 (N.C. 2002).
570 S.E.2d 212 (In Re Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re K.R.T.
808 S.E.2d 178 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)
In Matter of Th
689 S.E.2d 244 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)