In re Mitchell

Supreme Court of Alabama

In re Mitchell

71 So. 467, 196 Ala. 430, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 375

DecidedMarch 27, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 71 So. 467 (In re Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mitchell, 71 So. 467, 196 Ala. 430, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 375 (Ala. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

(4) Be it ordered by the court that, the said James A. Mitchell, the respondent, having disclaimed any intention of intimidating or influencing this court by the criticism of its opinion in a pending cause, and having satisfactorily qualified, explained, and withdrawn the expressions set out in specifications 2 and 3, and apologized for the use of same, the rule nisi is dissolved, and the respondent is discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

(4) Be it ordered by the court that, the said James A. Mitchell, the respondent, having disclaimed any intention of intimidating or influencing this court by the criticism of its opinion in a pending cause, and having satisfactorily qualified, explained, and withdrawn the expressions set out in specifications 2 and 3, and apologized for the use of same, the rule nisi is dissolved, and the respondent is discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 So. 467, 196 Ala. 430, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mitchell-ala-1916.