In re Mirretti

Arizona Supreme Court

In re Mirretti

889 P.2d 1086, 181 Ariz. 288, 1995 Ariz. LEXIS 127

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 18, 1995

DocketNo. SB-95-0005-D; Disciplinary Comm. No. 94-2444

StatusPublished

This text of 889 P.2d 1086 (In re Mirretti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mirretti, 889 P.2d 1086, 181 Ariz. 288, 1995 Ariz. LEXIS 127 (Ark. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT OF DISBARMENT

In accordance with the provisions of Rule 56(b)(2), Disbarment by Consent, Rules of the Supreme Court, and

Respondent STEPHEN P. MIRRETTI, JR. having consented to disbarment as a member of the State Bar of Arizona, and this Court having this date accepted the Consent to Disbarment,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that STEPHEN P. MIRRETTI, JR. be and hereby is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Arizona, effective as of the date of this judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 63(a), Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona, STEPHEN P. MIRRET-TI, JR. shall notify all of his clients, within ten (10) days from the date hereof, of his inability to continue to represent them and that they should promptly retain new counsel, and shall promptly inform this Court of his compliance with this Order as provided by Rule 63(d), Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT OF DISBARMENT

In accordance with the provisions of Rule 56(b)(2), Disbarment by Consent, Rules of the Supreme Court, and

Respondent STEPHEN P. MIRRETTI, JR. having consented to disbarment as a member of the State Bar of Arizona, and this Court having this date accepted the Consent to Disbarment,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that STEPHEN P. MIRRETTI, JR. be and hereby is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Arizona, effective as of the date of this judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 63(a), Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona, STEPHEN P. MIRRET-TI, JR. shall notify all of his clients, within ten (10) days from the date hereof, of his inability to continue to represent them and that they should promptly retain new counsel, and shall promptly inform this Court of his compliance with this Order as provided by Rule 63(d), Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

889 P.2d 1086, 181 Ariz. 288, 1995 Ariz. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mirretti-ariz-1995.