In re Mirrer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Mirrer

97 A.D.2d 121, 468 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20338

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.D.2d 121 (In re Mirrer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mirrer, 97 A.D.2d 121, 468 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20338 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, Second Department, on March 27,1957. By judgment rendered June 10, 1983 he was convicted, inter alia, of 10 counts of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, a class E felony. (Penal Law, § 175.35.)

As a result of such conviction respondent has been automatically disbarred pursuant to section 90 (subd 4, par a) of the Judiciary Law. (Matter of Wall, 75 AD2d 196.)

The petition to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys should be granted.

Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Asch and Milonas, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York, effective November 29, 1983.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI