In re Mirow

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Mirow

700 A.2d 1231, 151 N.J. 479, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 358

DecidedOctober 16, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 700 A.2d 1231 (In re Mirow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mirow, 700 A.2d 1231, 151 N.J. 479, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 358 (N.J. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on July 30, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that STEVEN B. MIROW of STRATFORD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 5.5(a) (failing to maintain a bona fide office), and the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that after one year, the Office of Attorney Ethics should verify that respondent is complying with the bona fide office rules, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that STEVEN B. MIROW is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics conduct an investigation after one year to determine whether respondent is complying with the bona fide office rules; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI