In re Mirer
This text of 31 A.D.2d 51 (In re Mirer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent was admitted to practice in the Second Judicial Department on March 16, 1932.
There were two charges made against respondent involving the conversion of $500 deposited with him in escrow (which sum was subsequently repaid) and neglect in the prosecution of a lawsuit resulting in the dismissal of his client’s case.
The Referee has found that respondent’s guilt on each of the charges of professional misconduct has been established and the [52]*52record fully supports such finding. The Referee’s report is confirmed.
A proper regard for the protection of the public would indicate that respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years pud until further order of the court.
Respondent should be suspended for a period of two years.
Stevens, J. P., Eager, Capozzoli, McQtvern and Rabin, JJ., concur.
Respondent suspended for a period of two years effective January 3, 1969.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 A.D.2d 51, 295 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mirer-nyappdiv-1968.