In re Mirarchi

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Mirarchi

891 A.2d 722

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 24, 2006

DocketNo. 1077 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 891 A.2d 722 (In re Mirarchi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mirarchi, 891 A.2d 722 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 24th day of January, 2006, a Rule having been entered by this Court on November 10, 2005, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Charles P. Mirarchi, III, to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute, Charles P. Mirarchi, III, is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Former Justice NIGRO did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 24th day of January, 2006, a Rule having been entered by this Court on November 10, 2005, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Charles P. Mirarchi, III, to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute, Charles P. Mirarchi, III, is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Former Justice NIGRO did not participate in this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

891 A.2d 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mirarchi-pa-2006.