In re Mira S. Burghardt

85 A.3d 102, 2014 WL 656857
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 20, 2014
Docket13-BG-1257
StatusPublished

This text of 85 A.3d 102 (In re Mira S. Burghardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Mira S. Burghardt, 85 A.3d 102, 2014 WL 656857 (D.C. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Massachusetts for a period of one year and one day, this court’s November 21, 2013, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why *103 the reciprocal discipline of a one-year and one-day suspension with a fitness requirement should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause but did file the affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) on December 6, 201B, it is

ORDERED that Mira S. Burghardt is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of one year and one day with reinstatement contingent upon a showing of fitness, nunc pro tunc to December 6, 2013. See, In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194,198 (D.C.2007).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Sibley
990 A.2d 483 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 A.3d 102, 2014 WL 656857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mira-s-burghardt-dc-2014.