In re Mira S. Burghardt

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Mira S. Burghardt

85 A.3d 102, 2014 WL 656857

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided February 20, 2014·No. 13-BG-1257·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Massachusetts for a period of one year and one day, this court’s November 21, 2013, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why *103 the reciprocal discipline of a one-year and one-day suspension with a fitness requirement should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause but did file the affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) on December 6, 201B, it is

ORDERED that Mira S. Burghardt is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of one year and one day with reinstatement contingent upon a showing of fitness, nunc pro tunc to December 6, 2013. See, In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194,198 (D.C.2007).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Massachusetts for a period of one year and one day, this court’s November 21, 2013, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why *103 the reciprocal discipline of a one-year and one-day suspension with a fitness requirement should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause but did file the affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) on December 6, 201B, it is

ORDERED that Mira S. Burghardt is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of one year and one day with reinstatement contingent upon a showing of fitness, nunc pro tunc to December 6, 2013. See, In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194,198 (D.C.2007).

In re Mira S. Burghardt, 85 A.3d 102, 2014 WL 656857 (D.C. 2014).

Pincite

85 A.3d 102 (In re Mira S. Burghardt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related