In re Mintz
This text of 216 A.D.2d 114 (In re Mintz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to confirm the Dissenting Report of the Hearing Panel recom[115]*115mending that petitioner be reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York denied, and the Majority Report of the Hearing Panel recommending that petitioner’s motion for reinstatement be denied is confirmed. No opinion. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 A.D.2d 114, 628 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mintz-nyappdiv-1995.