In re Minnesota Microsoft Antitrust Litigation

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Minnesota Microsoft Antitrust Litigation

617 N.W.2d 77, 2000 Minn. LEXIS 570, 2000 WL 1448505

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedSeptember 25, 2000

DocketNo. C3-00-1454

StatusPublished

This text of 617 N.W.2d 77 (In re Minnesota Microsoft Antitrust Litigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Minnesota Microsoft Antitrust Litigation, 617 N.W.2d 77, 2000 Minn. LEXIS 570, 2000 WL 1448505 (Mich. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Defendant Microsoft Corporation has moved for an order transferring and consolidating before a single district court judge in Hennepin County District Court all present and future cases in Minnesota state district courts involving antitrust claims against Microsoft similar to those alleged in Mednick v. Microsoft Corp., Civ. No. C0-00-1276 (Ramsey County Dist'. Ct.) and Gordon v. Microsoft Corp, Civ. No. 00-5994 (Hennepin County Dist. Ct.). Numerous similar cases in federal district courts have been consolidated for pretrial proceedings before a single federal district court judge, the Honorable J. Frederick Motz. Judge Motz has scheduled an October 24, 2000 meeting with state court judges to whom similar cases are assigned to discuss coordination of pretrial procéed-ings in the various federal and state court cases.

A necessary component in addressing Microsoft’s motion is an evaluation of the judicial resources that will be demanded by these cases. It is likely that a more accurate evaluation will be possible after the October 24, 2000 coordination meeting.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Microsoft Corporation’s motion for transfer and consolidation be, and the same is, stayed until after the. October 24, 2000 coordination meeting.

BY THE COURT:

Kathleen A. Blatz Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Defendant Microsoft Corporation has moved for an order transferring and consolidating before a single district court judge in Hennepin County District Court all present and future cases in Minnesota state district courts involving antitrust claims against Microsoft similar to those alleged in Mednick v. Microsoft Corp., Civ. No. C0-00-1276 (Ramsey County Dist'. Ct.) and Gordon v. Microsoft Corp, Civ. No. 00-5994 (Hennepin County Dist. Ct.). Numerous similar cases in federal district courts have been consolidated for pretrial proceedings before a single federal district court judge, the Honorable J. Frederick Motz. Judge Motz has scheduled an October 24, 2000 meeting with state court judges to whom similar cases are assigned to discuss coordination of pretrial procéed-ings in the various federal and state court cases.

A necessary component in addressing Microsoft’s motion is an evaluation of the judicial resources that will be demanded by these cases. It is likely that a more accurate evaluation will be possible after the October 24, 2000 coordination meeting.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Microsoft Corporation’s motion for transfer and consolidation be, and the same is, stayed until after the. October 24, 2000 coordination meeting.

BY THE COURT:

Kathleen A. Blatz Chief Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

617 N.W.2d 77, 2000 Minn. LEXIS 570, 2000 WL 1448505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-minnesota-microsoft-antitrust-litigation-minn-2000.