In re Miningham

412 S.E.2d 838, 261 Ga. 715, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 1005
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 2, 1991
DocketSupreme Court Disciplinary No. 882
StatusPublished

This text of 412 S.E.2d 838 (In re Miningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Miningham, 412 S.E.2d 838, 261 Ga. 715, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 1005 (Ga. 1991).

Opinion

Per curiam.

This matter has come before this court pursuant to Bar Rule 4-208.3 (a) of the Rules and Regulations for the Organization and Government of the State Bar of Georgia. The Investigative Panel of the State Disciplinary Board, after conducting its investigation, directed the Office of the General Counsel of the State Bar of Georgia to file a Notice of Discipline recommending disbarment, as defined by Bar Rule 4-102 (b) (1), of William D. Miningham III. The General Counsel filed the Notice of Discipline and perfected service upon Miningham by registered mail. Miningham failed to file a response to the Notice of Discipline within the twenty (20)-day period for rejection set by Bar Rule 4-208.3.

It is ordered that William D. Miningham III, be disbarred and his name removed from the roll of those individuals entitled to practice law in this state.1

All the Justices concur, except Hunt, J., who dissents. [716]*716Decided December 2, 1991. . William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
412 S.E.2d 838, 261 Ga. 715, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 1005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-miningham-ga-1991.