In re Milstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Milstein

96 A.D.2d 1088, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19739

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 23, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A.D.2d 1088 (In re Milstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Milstein, 96 A.D.2d 1088, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19739 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Application by petitioner Stanley I. Milstein, an attorney, who was disbarred by this court by order dated October 6, 1975 [49 AD2d 881] (1) to vacate the order of disbarment, which struck his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, and (2) to immediately reinstate him to the Bar of this State. The matter is referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second Judicial Department for investigation and report on (1) whether petitioner fully complied with the order of disbarment and (2) whether he presently possesses the requisite character and fitness to qualify to act as an attorney and counselor at law. The petitioner will be held in abeyance pending the committee’s report. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Lazer, Mangano and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by petitioner Stanley I. Milstein, an attorney, who was disbarred by this court by order dated October 6, 1975 [49 AD2d 881] (1) to vacate the order of disbarment, which struck his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, and (2) to immediately reinstate him to the Bar of this State. The matter is referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second Judicial Department for investigation and report on (1) whether petitioner fully complied with the order of disbarment and (2) whether he presently possesses the requisite character and fitness to qualify to act as an attorney and counselor at law. The petitioner will be held in abeyance pending the committee’s report. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Lazer, Mangano and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 1088, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-milstein-nyappdiv-1983.