In re Milstead

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Milstead

741 A.2d 79, 162 N.J. 96, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 1675

DecidedDecember 9, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 741 A.2d 79 (In re Milstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Milstead, 741 A.2d 79, 162 N.J. 96, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 1675 (N.J. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on June 22, 1999, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that RICHARD M. MIL-STEAD of VINELAND, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1965, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a) (failing to safeguard escrow funds), RPC 8.4(c) (disobeying an obligation under the rules of a tribunal), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RICHARD M. MILSTEAD is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on June 22, 1999, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that RICHARD M. MIL-STEAD of VINELAND, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1965, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a) (failing to safeguard escrow funds), RPC 8.4(c) (disobeying an obligation under the rules of a tribunal), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RICHARD M. MILSTEAD is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

741 A.2d 79, 162 N.J. 96, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 1675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-milstead-nj-1999.