In Re Milne

Supreme Court of Vermont

In Re Milne

222 A.2d 360, 126 Vt. 69

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided September 1, 1966·No. 1953·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The committee, appointed pursuant to 4 V.S.A. §844, to investigate the complaint for disbarment presented against the respondent, has heard the cause, and reported that the respondent has forged the names of clients and others on various legal documents. It found that the respondent has diverted funds of his clients to his own use.

*70 At the hearing on the report no objection was presented to the findings of the committee. The report is accepted.

Judgment that Donald G. Milne is removed from the office of attorney and counsellor at law and solicitor in chancery and his name is stricken from the rolls.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The committee, appointed pursuant to 4 V.S.A. §844, to investigate the complaint for disbarment presented against the respondent, has heard the cause, and reported that the respondent has forged the names of clients and others on various legal documents. It found that the respondent has diverted funds of his clients to his own use.

*70 At the hearing on the report no objection was presented to the findings of the committee. The report is accepted.

Judgment that Donald G. Milne is removed from the office of attorney and counsellor at law and solicitor in chancery and his name is stricken from the rolls.

In Re Milne, 222 A.2d 360, 126 Vt. 69 (Vt. 1966).

Pincite

222 A.2d 360 (In Re Milne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related