In re Mills

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Mills

605 A.2d 1078, 127 N.J. 401, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1069

DecidedMay 4, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 605 A.2d 1078 (In re Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mills, 605 A.2d 1078, 127 N.J. 401, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1069 (N.J. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

[402]*402ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court, recommending that by way of reciprocal discipline, STEPHEN R. MILLS of LIVINGSTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, and who was publicly reprimanded by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for violating RPC 4.1(a)(1) (making a false statement of fact), RPC 4.2 (contacting a litigant directly), and RPC 8.4(c) (making a misrepresentation), be publicly reprimanded, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are hereby adopted and respondent is publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[402]*402ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court, recommending that by way of reciprocal discipline, STEPHEN R. MILLS of LIVINGSTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, and who was publicly reprimanded by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for violating RPC 4.1(a)(1) (making a false statement of fact), RPC 4.2 (contacting a litigant directly), and RPC 8.4(c) (making a misrepresentation), be publicly reprimanded, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are hereby adopted and respondent is publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

605 A.2d 1078, 127 N.J. 401, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mills-nj-1992.