In re Miller
231 P. 28, 131 Wash. 702, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 936
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 Wash. 538 →
Opinion
On Rehearing.
In the petition for rehearing in this case (129 Wash. 538, 225 Pac. 429), our attention is called to what is claimed to be an incorrect statement in the opinion where it is said that “he admits” he has not yet served the sentence which was legally imposed. The words “he admits” will be eliminated from the opinion and there will be substituted in their stead “it has been held” (State v. Miller, 78 Wash. 268, 138 Pac. 896). With this substitution the petition for rehearing will be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Miller, 231 P. 28, 131 Wash. 702, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 936 (Wash. 1924).
231 P. 28 (In re Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Miller
225 P. 429 (Washington Supreme Court, 1924)
State v. Miller
138 P. 896 (Washington Supreme Court, 1914)