In re Miller

746 A.2d 605
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 1, 2000
DocketNo. 553 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 746 A.2d 605 (In re Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Miller, 746 A.2d 605 (Pa. 2000).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2000, Samuel Robert Miller, III, having been [606]*606disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated September 14, 1999; the said Samuel Robert Miller, III, having been directed on December 17,1999, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Samuel Robert Miller, III, is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
746 A.2d 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-miller-pa-2000.