In re Miller

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Miller

762 N.E.2d 368, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1449, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 312

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 6, 2002

Docket01-2173

StatusPublished

This text of 762 N.E.2d 368 (In re Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Miller, 762 N.E.2d 368, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1449, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 312 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Certified State Law Question, No. 0014433. On review of preliminary memorandum pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(6) and on motion for leave to file preliminary memorandum of Ohio Attorney General with preliminary memorandum attached.

The court declines to answer the following certified questions:

“1. Did the inclusion of Ohio Revised Code § 5301.234 in House Bill No. 163 of the 123d General Assembly violate the single subject provision of Article II, § 15(D) of the Ohio Constitution?

“2. Did the adoption of Ohio Revised Code § 5301.234 violate Article IV, § 5(B) of the Ohio Constitution?”

This cause is therefore dismissed.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Douglas, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI