In re Miller

2 Liquor Tax Rep. 330
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 13, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Liquor Tax Rep. 330 (In re Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Miller, 2 Liquor Tax Rep. 330 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Opinion

Leventritt, J.

It is clear that in the absence of the required number of consents the respondent was not entitled to receive or hold the certificate. The fact that his mistake was innocent and that he believed that he had complied with the provisions of the Liquor Tax Law cannot prevent cancellation, although it should relieve from the payment of costs.

Motion granted accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Liquor Tax Rep. 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-miller-nysupct-1900.