In re Miller
This text of 170 A.D.2d 122 (In re Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[123]*123OPINION OF THE COURT
On November 9, 1990, the respondent was convicted in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, upon his plea of guilty, of the crime of grand larceny in the fourth degree in violation of Penal Law § 155.30, which constitutes a class E felony. On January 4, 1991, the respondent was sentenced to a term of probation of five years, 420 hours of community service in lieu of 90 days in the Suffolk County jail, and restitution in the amount of $1,500 plus a 5% designated surcharge. A confession of judgment was also signed.
Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony.
Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.
Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent Bruce Jay Miller is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, the respondent Bruce Jay Miller is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 A.D.2d 122, 573 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-miller-nyappdiv-1991.