In re Miller

607 A.2d 164, 128 N.J. 53, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1441
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 11, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

STEVEN F. MILLER,

of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, having been Ordered to Show Cause on June 11, 1992, why this Court’s Order of temporary suspension should not be continued pending the disposition of ethics proceedings against him, and respondent having consented through counsel to the continuation prior to the return date of the Order to Show Cause;

It is Ordered that the suspension of STEVEN F. MILLER shall continue pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he shall continue to comply with Regulation 23 of the Administrative Guidelines Governing Suspended Attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics shall take such protective action pursuant to Rule l:20-ll(c) as it deems appropriate, including the transfer to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund the attorney account funds held in any financial institution by STEVEN F. MILLER, which funds were restrained from disbursement by this Court’s Order of May 12, 1992.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Miller, 607 A.2d 164, 128 N.J. 53, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1441 (N.J. 1992).

607 A.2d 164 (In re Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Paige
607 A.2d 164 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)