In re Miller

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Miller

145 A.2d 785, 28 N.J. 217, 1958 N.J. LEXIS 159

DecidedNovember 17, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 145 A.2d 785 (In re Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Miller, 145 A.2d 785, 28 N.J. 217, 1958 N.J. LEXIS 159 (N.J. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam:.

The respondent freely admits his violation of the Canons of Ethics. The Hudson County Ethics and Grievance Committee unanimously recommended no discipline beyond reprimand. Under the unusual circumstances of this case we concur in the recommendation of the committee and accordingly the respondent is hereby reprimanded.

Guilty and for reprimand—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Heher, Burling, Jacobs, Eeancis and Proctor—6.

Not guilty—Justice Waoi-ieneeld—1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam:.

The respondent freely admits his violation of the Canons of Ethics. The Hudson County Ethics and Grievance Committee unanimously recommended no discipline beyond reprimand. Under the unusual circumstances of this case we concur in the recommendation of the committee and accordingly the respondent is hereby reprimanded.

Guilty and for reprimand—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Heher, Burling, Jacobs, Eeancis and Proctor—6.

Not guilty—Justice Waoi-ieneeld—1.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 A.2d 785, 28 N.J. 217, 1958 N.J. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-miller-nj-1958.