In re Miller
89 A.2d 255, 9 N.J. 594, 1952 N.J. LEXIS 336
This text of 89 A.2d 255 (In re Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Miller, 89 A.2d 255, 9 N.J. 594, 1952 N.J. LEXIS 336 (N.J. 1952).
Opinion
The name of the respondent will be ordered stricken from the rolls of attorneys and counsellors at law for the conduct set forth in the opinion of this court in State of New Jersey v. Goodman, 9 N. J. 569.
For disbarment — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan —6.
Opposed — -None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
R. KREVOLIN & CO., INC. v. Brown
89 A.2d 255 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
89 A.2d 255, 9 N.J. 594, 1952 N.J. LEXIS 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-miller-nj-1952.