In re Miller

89 A.2d 255, 9 N.J. 594, 1952 N.J. LEXIS 336
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 9, 1952·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The name of the respondent will be ordered stricken from the rolls of attorneys and counsellors at law for the conduct set forth in the opinion of this court in State of New Jersey v. Goodman, 9 N. J. 569.

For disbarment — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan —6.

Opposed — -None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Miller, 89 A.2d 255, 9 N.J. 594, 1952 N.J. LEXIS 336 (N.J. 1952).

89 A.2d 255 (In re Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
R. KREVOLIN & CO., INC. v. Brown
89 A.2d 255 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)