In re Miller
This text of 154 A. 627 (In re Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In 1922, there was a plea of non-vult to charges of obtaining money under false pretenses and embezzlement. Sentence was served in the Essex county penitentiary. For three or four years after release no professional occupation is said to have been pursued. In 1927, or 1928, the practice •of law was resumed. In at least two instances since, clients’ money has been retained improperly. No reason exists for the continuance of a professional calling when neither trust ■or confidence exists.
The report of the board of bar examiners is confirmed, and rule of disbarment will accordingly be entered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 A. 627, 9 N.J. Misc. 187, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-miller-nj-1931.