In re Miller

508 N.E.2d 554, 1987 Ind. LEXIS 946
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 10, 1987
DocketNo. 185S27
StatusPublished

This text of 508 N.E.2d 554 (In re Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Miller, 508 N.E.2d 554, 1987 Ind. LEXIS 946 (Ind. 1987).

Opinion

ORDER ACCEPTING RESIGNATION

Comes now the Respondent, James B. Miller, and petitions this Court for leave to resign from the Bar and tenders his affidavit pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 17.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the Respondent's affidavit meets the necessary requirements set forth in Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 17. Accordingly, this Court now finds that the resignation should be accepted and is to be effective immediately. In light of Respondent's resignation, we further find that the pending disciplinary proceeding has become moot and should be dismissed as such.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that James B. Miller is hereby removed as a member of the Bar of this State and that the Clerk of this Court remove his name from the roll of attorneys. -It is also Ordered that the Respondent must comply with the provisions of Admission and Disciple Rule 23, Section 4, in order to become eligible for reinstatement in the future. It is further Ordered that the pending disciplinary proceeding is dismissed as moot.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward notice of this Order in accordance with the provisions of Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 3(d) governing disbarment and suspension.

Costs of this proceeding are assessed against the Respondent.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
508 N.E.2d 554, 1987 Ind. LEXIS 946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-miller-ind-1987.