In re: Miller

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 17, 2010·No. 092405·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2405

In Re: HENRY EARL MILLER,

Petitioner.

No. 10-1028

On Petitions for Writ of Mandamus. (6:04-cr-00022-HFF-3)

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 17, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Earl Miller, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Henry Earl Miller petitions for writs of mandamus,

alleging the district court has unduly delayed ruling on his

motions for written orders setting forth his offense conduct

which resulted in his convictions. He seeks an order from this

court directing the district court to act. Our review of the

docket sheet reveals that the district court denied these

motions in a text order on December 29, 2009. Accordingly,

because the district court has recently decided Miller’s

motions, we deny the mandamus petitions as moot. We grant leave

to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITIONS DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Miller, (4th Cir. 2010).

In re: Miller (In re: Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.