In re Miller

Second Circuit

In re Miller

198 F.2d 267

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 19, 1952

DocketNo. 264, Docket 22305

StatusPublished

This text of 198 F.2d 267 (In re Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Miller, 198 F.2d 267 (2d Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judge Smith has discussed all the perti neiit questions raised by the appellant, 106 [268]*268F.Supp. 40. He decided that she had proposed no practicable plan of rehabilitation, that her charges of bad faith and fraud were groundless, and dismissed her final petition under the Frazier-Lemke Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203, and certain counterclaims under the Sherman and Clayton Acts, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. We concur in his action and are convinced that it is past the time when this appellant should be allowed by any means to further prevent her creditors from proceeding in the State Courts to liquidate their claims.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Judge Smith has discussed all the perti neiit questions raised by the appellant, 106 [268]*268F.Supp. 40. He decided that she had proposed no practicable plan of rehabilitation, that her charges of bad faith and fraud were groundless, and dismissed her final petition under the Frazier-Lemke Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203, and certain counterclaims under the Sherman and Clayton Acts, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. We concur in his action and are convinced that it is past the time when this appellant should be allowed by any means to further prevent her creditors from proceeding in the State Courts to liquidate their claims.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 F.2d 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-miller-ca2-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack