in Re: Millard Vaughn
This text of in Re: Millard Vaughn (in Re: Millard Vaughn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-05-00356-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
§
IN RE: MILLARD VAUGHN, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
RELATOR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Millard Vaughn filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking relief from a contempt judgment signed by the Honorable Charles Mitchell, Judge of the 273rd Judicial District Court of Sabine County, Texas. Paul Drennon and Mary Drennon are the real parties in interest. After Vaughn filed his mandamus petition, the parties filed an agreed motion to vacate the contempt judgment. On June 12, 2006, Respondent signed an order granting the motion and vacating the contempt judgment. Consequently, the issues raised in this proceeding are now moot. Accordingly, this original proceeding is dismissed.
Opinion delivered June 14, 2006.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.
(PUBLISH)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Millard Vaughn, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-millard-vaughn-texapp-2006.