In re Militano

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Militano

822 A.2d 600, 176 N.J. 265, 2003 N.J. LEXIS 570

DecidedMay 21, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 822 A.2d 600 (In re Militano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Militano, 822 A.2d 600, 176 N.J. 265, 2003 N.J. LEXIS 570 (N.J. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 02-350, concluding that THOMAS F. MILITANO of NEWTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 5.5(a) (failure to maintain a bona fide office) and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities);

And the Court having determined from its review of the record that a period of supervised practice is warranted;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS F. MILITANO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[266]*266ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI