in Re: Mildred Mel Gregory, Anita Gail Gregory Smith, Sharon Ann Gregory Hicks, and Carrie Gay Gregory
This text of in Re: Mildred Mel Gregory, Anita Gail Gregory Smith, Sharon Ann Gregory Hicks, and Carrie Gay Gregory (in Re: Mildred Mel Gregory, Anita Gail Gregory Smith, Sharon Ann Gregory Hicks, and Carrie Gay Gregory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-06-174-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE: MILDRED MEL GREGORY, ANITA GAIL GREGORY SMITH, SHARON ANN GREGORY HICKS, AND CARRIE GAY GREGORY
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Castillo
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
Relators, Mildred Mel Gregory, Anita Gail Gregory Smith, Sharon Ann Gregory Hicks, and Carrie Gay Gregory, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on April 17, 2006. Having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, the Court is of the opinion that (1) Relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought and, thus, (2) the petition must be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 20th day of April 2006.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Mildred Mel Gregory, Anita Gail Gregory Smith, Sharon Ann Gregory Hicks, and Carrie Gay Gregory, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mildred-mel-gregory-anita-gail-gregory-smith-texapp-2006.