In re Milara

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Milara

162 A.3d 249, 229 N.J. 262, 2017 WL 2558519, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 634

DecidedMay 12, 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 162 A.3d 249 (In re Milara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Milara, 162 A.3d 249, 229 N.J. 262, 2017 WL 2558519, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 634 (N.J. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court pursuant to Rule 1:20-15(k) a recommendation (DRB 17-116) that DIEGO P. MILARA of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since January 22, 2015, be suspended from the practice of law and compelled to pay a monetary sanction to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for failure to comply with the determination of the District VA Fee Arbitration Committee in Docket No. VA-2016-0455F, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DIEGO P. MILARA be temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective June 12, 2017, and until respondent complies with the determination of the District VA Fee Arbitration Committee in Docket No. VA-2016-0455F, pays a sanction of $500 to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee, and until the further Order of the Court; provided, however, this Order, in respect of the determination in Docket No. VA-20160455F, shall be vacated automatically if the Disciplinary Review Board reports to the Court that prior to the effective date of the suspension respondent has satisfied all obligations under this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that if respondent seeks to be heard on this matter, he shall file with the Clerk of the Court within ten days of the file date of this Order a written request for the issuance of an Order to Show Cause; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he continue to comply with Rule 1:20-20, and it is further

[263]*263ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court pursuant to Rule 1:20-15(k) a recommendation (DRB 17-116) that DIEGO P. MILARA of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since January 22, 2015, be suspended from the practice of law and compelled to pay a monetary sanction to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for failure to comply with the determination of the District VA Fee Arbitration Committee in Docket No. VA-2016-0455F, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DIEGO P. MILARA be temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective June 12, 2017, and until respondent complies with the determination of the District VA Fee Arbitration Committee in Docket No. VA-2016-0455F, pays a sanction of $500 to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee, and until the further Order of the Court; provided, however, this Order, in respect of the determination in Docket No. VA-20160455F, shall be vacated automatically if the Disciplinary Review Board reports to the Court that prior to the effective date of the suspension respondent has satisfied all obligations under this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that if respondent seeks to be heard on this matter, he shall file with the Clerk of the Court within ten days of the file date of this Order a written request for the issuance of an Order to Show Cause; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he continue to comply with Rule 1:20-20, and it is further

[263]*263ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 A.3d 249, 229 N.J. 262, 2017 WL 2558519, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-milara-nj-2017.