In re Milanovich

13 F. App'x 144
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 5, 2001
DocketNo. 01-6171
StatusPublished

This text of 13 F. App'x 144 (In re Milanovich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Milanovich, 13 F. App'x 144 (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Milanovich petitions this court for a writ of mandamus compelling Chief District Judge Graham C. Mullen to reverse his order transferring Milanovich’s civil action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia. Milanovich has failed to demonstrate he has no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires or that his right to mandamus relief is clear and indisputable. See Allied Chem. Corp. v. Diaflon, 449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980).

Accordingly, we grant Milanovich’s motion for relief from the provisions of Fed. R.App.P. 21, but we deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.
449 U.S. 33 (Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 F. App'x 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-milanovich-ca4-2001.