in Re Mike Stetson and Mary Ann L. Amaya
This text of in Re Mike Stetson and Mary Ann L. Amaya (in Re Mike Stetson and Mary Ann L. Amaya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Honorable David Peeples, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. López, Justice
Catherine Stone, Justice
Paul W. Green, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 9, 2000
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
The court has considered the relators' petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied because the denial of a jury trial can be remedied by appeal. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833 (Tex. 1992) (emphasizing the no-adequate-remedy-by-appeal requirement in mandamus review); General Motors Corp. v. Gayle, 924 S.W.2d 222, 226 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1996) (denying mandamus relief because denial of jury trial could be appealed). Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus and request for temporary relief are denied. Relators shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Mike Stetson and Mary Ann L. Amaya, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mike-stetson-and-mary-ann-l-amaya-texapp-2000.