In Re: Midland 1235 Investment Trust; Farah N. Irvin-Matott; And James Lance Irvin v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: Midland 1235 Investment Trust; Farah N. Irvin-Matott; And James Lance Irvin v. the State of Texas (In Re: Midland 1235 Investment Trust; Farah N. Irvin-Matott; And James Lance Irvin v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT
In re: Midland 1235 Investment * Original Mandamus Proceeding Trust; Farah N. Irvin-Matott; and James Lance Irvin,
No. 11-24-00255-CV * February 6, 2025
* Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)
This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Midland 1235 Investment Trust; Farah N. Irvin-Matott; And James Lance Irvin v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-midland-1235-investment-trust-farah-n-irvin-matott-and-james-texapp-2025.