In Re: Midland 1235 Investment Trust; Farah N. Irvin-Matott; And James Lance Irvin v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re: Midland 1235 Investment Trust; Farah N. Irvin-Matott; And James Lance Irvin v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 6, 2025·No. 11-24-00255-CV·Published

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

In re: Midland 1235 Investment * Original Mandamus Proceeding Trust; Farah N. Irvin-Matott; and James Lance Irvin,

No. 11-24-00255-CV * February 6, 2025

* Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

In re: Midland 1235 Investment * Original Mandamus Proceeding Trust; Farah N. Irvin-Matott; and James Lance Irvin,

No. 11-24-00255-CV * February 6, 2025

* Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

In Re: Midland 1235 Investment Trust; Farah N. Irvin-Matott; And James Lance Irvin v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

In Re: Midland 1235 Investment Trust; Farah N. Irvin-Matott; And James Lance Irvin v. the State of Texas (In Re: Midland 1235 Investment Trust; Farah N. Irvin-Matott; And James Lance Irvin v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.