In re Middlebrooks

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Middlebrooks

82 A.3d 925, 216 N.J. 407, 2013 WL 7087015, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 1351

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 13, 2013·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-061, concluding that MELINDA MIDDLE-BROOKS of SPRINGFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7(a)(2) (conflict of interest), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MELINDA MIDDLEBROOKS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-061, concluding that MELINDA MIDDLE-BROOKS of SPRINGFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7(a)(2) (conflict of interest), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MELINDA MIDDLEBROOKS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

In re Middlebrooks, 82 A.3d 925, 216 N.J. 407, 2013 WL 7087015, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 1351 (N.J. 2013).

Pincite

82 A.3d 925 (In re Middlebrooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.