In Re: Microvideo Learning Systems, Inc., Debtor. Calet, Hirsch & Ferrell v. Microvideo Learning Systems, Inc.

Second Circuit

In Re: Microvideo Learning Systems, Inc., Debtor. Calet, Hirsch & Ferrell v. Microvideo Learning Systems, Inc.

227 F.3d 474, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23791

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedSeptember 26, 2000

Docket1999

StatusPublished

This text of 227 F.3d 474 (In Re: Microvideo Learning Systems, Inc., Debtor. Calet, Hirsch & Ferrell v. Microvideo Learning Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re: Microvideo Learning Systems, Inc., Debtor. Calet, Hirsch & Ferrell v. Microvideo Learning Systems, Inc., 227 F.3d 474, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23791 (2d Cir. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

227 F.3d 474 (2nd Cir. 2000)

In Re: MICROVIDEO LEARNING SYSTEMS, INC., Debtor.
CALET, HIRSCH & FERRELL, Appellant,
v.
MICROVIDEO LEARNING SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee.

Docket No. 00-5003
August Term, 1999

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

Argued: June 30, 2000
Decided: September 26, 2000

Appeal by Calet, Hirsch & Ferrell from denial of motion to compel payment by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Baer, J.). The Court of Appeals affirms the judgment.

DAVID M. HILLMAN, New York, NY, for Appellant.

SCOTT S. MARKOWITZ, New York, NY, for Appellee.

Before: LEVAL, PARKER, and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm for the reasons stated by the Bankruptcy Court in In re Microvideo Learning Systems, Inc., 232 B.R. 602 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1999) (Gallet, Bankr. J.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI