In re Michaela PP.

67 A.D.3d 1083, 886 N.Y.S.2d 923
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 5, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 67 A.D.3d 1083 (In re Michaela PP.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Michaela PP., 67 A.D.3d 1083, 886 N.Y.S.2d 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Cardona, EJ.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Charnetsky, J.), entered December 5, 2008, [1084]*1084which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10-A, to approve petitioner’s permanency plans for the subject children.

Respondent is the father of two children (born in 1994 and 1995). In 2004, the children were adjudicated to be neglected and placed in foster care. The children’s mother surrendered her parental rights in 2008, and petitioner filed a petition seeking to terminate respondent’s parental rights on the ground of abandonment. Petitioner also sought to alter the children’s permanency plans to free them for adoption, and a permanency hearing was scheduled prior to the resolution of the abandonment petition. The parties ultimately agreed to permanency plans which had the stated goal of returning the children to respondent pending the outcome of the abandonment petition. Family Court issued an order embodying that agreement, and respondent appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fifield v. Whiting
118 A.D.3d 1072 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
In re Telsa Z.
90 A.D.3d 1193 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Hardnett v. John
85 A.D.3d 1501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re Selena O.
84 A.D.3d 1648 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Loomis v. Yu-Jen G.
81 A.D.3d 1083 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Marshall v. Haas
74 A.D.3d 1593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 A.D.3d 1083, 886 N.Y.S.2d 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michaela-pp-nyappdiv-2009.