in Re Michael William Godfrey

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 10, 2015·No. 14-15-00886-CR·Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 10, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00886-CR

IN RE MICHAEL WILLIAM GODFREY, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 230th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 912345

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 20, 2015, relator Michael William Godfrey filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Brad Hart, presiding judge of the 230th District Court of Harris County, to rule on his motion nunc pro tunc.

On November 5, 2015, the trial court signed an order denying relator’s motion nunc pro tunc. Relator’s request for relief is moot. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, McCally, and Wise. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Michael William Godfrey, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

in Re Michael William Godfrey (in Re Michael William Godfrey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.