in Re Michael Sutton

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-154-CV

IN RE MICHAEL SUTTON RELATOR ------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.2 Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL A: LIVINGSTON, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and HOLMAN, J. DELIVERED: April 24, 2008

1 … See T EX. R. A PP. P. 47.4.

2 … See Wentworth v. Meyer, 839 S.W.2d 766, 767 (Tex. 1992) (orig.

proceeding); In re Jackson, 14 S.W.3d 843, 846 (Tex. App.—Waco 2000, orig. proceeding); City of La Porte v. State ex rel. Rose, 376 S.W.2d 894, 906-07 (Tex. Civ. App.—Austin 1964), rev’d in part on other grounds, 386 S.W.2d 782 (Tex. 1965); see also In re Sanchez, 81 S.W.3d 794, 796 (Tex. 2002) (orig. proceeding).