in Re Michael Sutton

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Michael Sutton

DecidedApril 24, 2008

Docket02-08-00154-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Michael Sutton (in Re Michael Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Michael Sutton, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-154-CV

IN RE MICHAEL SUTTON RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is

of the opinion that relief should be denied.2 Accordingly, relator’s petition for

writ of mandamus is denied.

Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let

execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL A: LIVINGSTON, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and HOLMAN, J.

DELIVERED: April 24, 2008

1 … See T EX. R. A PP. P. 47.4. 2 … See Wentworth v. Meyer, 839 S.W.2d 766, 767 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding); In re Jackson, 14 S.W.3d 843, 846 (Tex. App.—Waco 2000, orig. proceeding); City of La Porte v. State ex rel. Rose, 376 S.W.2d 894, 906-07 (Tex. Civ. App.—Austin 1964), rev’d in part on other grounds, 386 S.W.2d 782 (Tex. 1965); see also In re Sanchez, 81 S.W.3d 794, 796 (Tex. 2002) (orig. proceeding).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI