in Re Michael Scott Neil
This text of in Re Michael Scott Neil (in Re Michael Scott Neil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-13-00144-CV ____________________
IN RE MICHAEL SCOTT NEIL
_______________________________________________________ ______________
Original Proceeding ________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Michael Scott Neil petitions to compel the acceptance of his application for
a place on the ballot in the May 2013 election of the Trustees of the Beaumont
Independent School District (BISD). See Tex. Elec. Code Ann. § 273.061 (West
2010). We hold that under the circumstances of this case, the governing statute
requires all trustee positions be filled in the election and that respondent has a
mandatory duty imposed by law to accept the applications for the positions that
were timely presented. In re Rodriguez, No. 09-13-00115-CV, 2013 WL 1189005,
at *6 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Mar. 18, 2013, orig. proceeding); see also Tex. Educ.
Code Ann. § 11.052 (West 2012). Rodriguez concerned applications submitted by
1 different candidates for the same election as the one at issue here, and our
reasoning and application of the law in that case is the same here. See Rodriguez,
2013 WL 1189005, at *1-6.
In this mandamus proceeding, BISD asserts its October 18, 2012 amendment
to its local policy was contingent on the 5-2 plan being approved by the
Department of Justice. The Board’s amendment was necessarily contingent, but as
we stated in Rodriguez, “[r]egardless, the Board has not expressly provided for the
trustees in office to serve for the remainder of their terms in accordance with
section 11.053 of the Education Code.” Id. at *5; see also Tex. Educ. Code Ann. §
11.053 (West 2012). The local policy BISD relies on “does not expressly address
the effect of the redistricting.” See Rodriguez, 2013 WL 1189005, at *5.
We hold that the election scheduled for May 11, 2013, is to be conducted
using the redistricting map adopted February 21, 2013. Id. We presume BISD will
comply with federal preclearance requirements and seek expedited review if it has
not already done so. We grant the writ, and order BISD to accept Neil’s application
and to place his name on the ballot, or to otherwise certify his election as an
unopposed candidate to the extent authorized by the Election Code and the
Education Code. Id. Under Rule 2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, in
2 order to expedite a final decision in this matter in view of the upcoming election,
no motion for rehearing will be permitted. See Tex. R. App. P. 2.
PETITION GRANTED.
PER CURIAM
Opinion Delivered March 28, 2013 Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Michael Scott Neil, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-scott-neil-texapp-2013.