In re Michael S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Michael S.

303 A.D.2d 170, 754 N.Y.S.2d 886, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1949

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 A.D.2d 170 (In re Michael S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Michael S., 303 A.D.2d 170, 754 N.Y.S.2d 886, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Myrna Martinez-Perez, J.), entered on or about September 25, 2001, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of sodomy in the first degree and two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, and placed him on probation for 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis to disturb the [171]*171court’s credibility determinations, in which it carefully considered the relevant circumstances, including demeanor. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Buckley, Sullivan, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Myrna Martinez-Perez, J.), entered on or about September 25, 2001, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of sodomy in the first degree and two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, and placed him on probation for 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis to disturb the [171]*171court’s credibility determinations, in which it carefully considered the relevant circumstances, including demeanor. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Buckley, Sullivan, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 A.D.2d 170, 754 N.Y.S.2d 886, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-s-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack