in Re Michael Robert VanWinkle

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00332-CV

IN RE MICHAEL ROBERT RELATOR VANWINKLE

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of

the opinion that relief should be denied. 2 Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, GARDNER, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: November 29, 2010

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4., 52.8(d). 2 We make no determination regarding the trial court’s failure to rule on Relator’s “Declaration of Conflict Between Attorney and Client and Motion for Substitution of Appointed Counsel” because Relator has not specifically sought relief as to that motion.