in Re: Michael Newsome

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 26, 2007
Docket12-07-00354-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Michael Newsome (in Re: Michael Newsome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Michael Newsome, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

                                                                                                        NO. 12-07-00354-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

§                      APPEAL FROM THE 369TH

IN RE:

§                      JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

MICHAEL NEWSOME

§                      ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

            In this original mandamus proceeding, Michael Newsome complains that Janice Staples, District Clerk of Anderson County, Texas, has not notified him that she received and filed his petition and motion and has not furnished him with the assigned trial court case number.  He further states that he cannot file other motions until he receives file marked copies of the original documents. 

            A court of appeals has the authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county in the court of appeals district and all writs necessary to enforce its jurisdiction.  Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004).  In order for a district clerk to fall within our jurisdictional reach, it must be established that the issuance of the writ of mandamus is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction.  See id.; In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692-93 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding).  Newsome has not demonstrated that the exercise of our mandamus authority against Staples is appropriate to enforce our jurisdiction.  Consequently, we have no authority to issue a writ of mandamus.  Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

                                                                                                    BRIAN HOYLE   

                                                                                                               Justice

Opinion delivered September 26, 2007.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Coronado
980 S.W.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Michael Newsome, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-newsome-texapp-2007.