in Re: Michael Long

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 29, 2021
Docket05-21-00574-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Michael Long (in Re: Michael Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Michael Long, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

DENY and Opinion Filed July 29, 2021

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00574-CV

IN RE MICHAEL LONG, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 417th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 417-53803-2020

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Smith Opinion by Justice Smith In this petition for writ of mandamus, relator challenges the trial judge’s

temporary orders in the underlying suit against the parent-child relationship

(SAPCR) and the order denying relator’s motion to recuse the trial judge from the

modification proceeding.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court has

clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In

re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

After reviewing the petition and record, we conclude that relator has failed to show

an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a). We deny relator’s motion for emergency relief as moot. /Craig Smith/ CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE

210574F.P05

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Michael Long, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-long-texapp-2021.