in Re: Michael Long
This text of in Re: Michael Long (in Re: Michael Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed July 29, 2021
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00574-CV
IN RE MICHAEL LONG, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 417th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 417-53803-2020
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Smith Opinion by Justice Smith In this petition for writ of mandamus, relator challenges the trial judge’s
temporary orders in the underlying suit against the parent-child relationship
(SAPCR) and the order denying relator’s motion to recuse the trial judge from the
modification proceeding.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court has
clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In
re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
After reviewing the petition and record, we conclude that relator has failed to show
an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a). We deny relator’s motion for emergency relief as moot. /Craig Smith/ CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE
210574F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Michael Long, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-michael-long-texapp-2021.